Best Cheap Mixer For Home studio – The Ultimate list

The best mixers are instinctive and feature-rich, noiselessly blending your signals, incorporating with your DAW, and giving you the power to modify the sound of each channel.

Today’s designs include USB connectivity, digital control, and SD cards that can keep recordings.

Sifting through these features to decide what’s best for you can seem overwhelming, but do not stress: we’ve assembled a list of the ten best mixers for a house studio here.

best mixer for home studio
best mixer for home studio

Contents show

Our Top Picks

Best Analog Mixer

The classic analog blending board, with its rows of faders, meters, and pots appears in television, film, and music studios worldwide and is the widely acknowledged tool of the sound engineer: the real sign of a professional studio.

Mackie ProFX 8 V2

Finest Digital Mixer

BEHRINGER, X-32 Producer

Best For Podcasting & Streaming

Yamaha AG06

Leading 10 Best USB Mixers for Home Studio

DIGITAL MIXERS

  1. BEHRINGER, X-32 Producer

    Behringer balances brand-new innovation with user-friendliness and a killer rate to create a terrific mixer for your house studio.
  2. Even without its ingenious standout features, it’s a strong piece of equipment for an affordable rate: 40 input channels with 16 XLR Inputs (great for singer-songwriters and coffee-shop entertainers) 8 multi-effects processors, phantom power for condenser mics, and durable, rack-mountable style.

Particularly helpful for podcasters or little radio program hosts are the phone compatibility, sound trigger pads, and the pre-recorded scene callback.

These make it easy to run your own talk show with the Zoom LiveTrak: you can accept calls and play pre-recorded scenes or sound-effects while streaming a podcast.

Loud preamps.

Weak wifi signal.

Cost & Reviews.

  1. Mackie DL32R.

    Mackie’s high-quality mixers made them two areas here. The DL32R is another tidy, noise-free mixer that crams in the features while keeping a structured, long lasting character. While the other Mackie design we reviewed was analog, this is their take on a digital mixer, and it shows that Mackie can operate in both worlds.

Pros

Economical rate

High-quality hardware

Steady software application

Integrated processor

Ethernet suitable

PC suitable

Lots of effects.

Cons

The Qu-Pac has every input possible, along with all the other needed expert functions: invisibly peaceful preamps, hundreds of effects, and USB compatibility.

It also includes its own DSP and has the multitrack capability, as well as direct-to-USB multitrack recording.

Another fresh function is the ability to blend any entertainer’s screen from their own gadget, be it android or iOS. Indeed, the only disadvantage of the mixer might be that you need to use an iPad app for the master controls: sorry, Android fans.

Multitrack ability

Podcaster-specific features

Sound trigger pads

Battery-powered

Cons

Even if you discount the gadget itself, the control software is a major emphasize: it’s practically like having a complete DAW in the mixer controls.

You get vintage compressor and EQ control designs, graphic equalizers, and four-band parametric EQ, all of which offer you a level of control over the noise of your mix that is almost unrivaled.

While the device, in addition to the private screen controls, can just be managed through iOS, the mixer is fully compatible through USB with PC, and you can tape direct-to-drive.

Naturally, this is amongst the more expensive of the mixers on the list, but when you think about the remarkable features, a big variety of channels, and technical developments, as well as Allen and Heath’s performance history for producing resilient, expert hardware, you’ll thank yourself for spending a little extra.

USB doubles as power source

Compatibility is limited

Cost & Reviews

  1. Allen and Heath Qu-Pac

    If you’re searching for a mixer that has 16 channels and a truckload of digital effects, and you have no nostalgic accessory to analog design, look no further than this Allen and Heath technological marvel.
  2. The Qu-Pac is Allen and Heath’s QU-32 mixer, but a stripped back version and reduced to simply 16 (or 38, with the purchase of a little additional hardware) channel inputs. It produces an excellent quantity of top quality hardware packed into a little, however incredibly effective, box.

Pros.

This design is also more of a hybrid than the Yamaha: while it was built particularly for podcasting, it can function well for little home music taping tasks too. It can deal with approximately 12 inputs and repeat 10 simultaneously for live streaming or efficiency circumstances.

Together with the clean design and strong dependability, the X-32 Producer’s developments do not hurt: instead of only dealing with tablets and mobile phones, the control app works with iOS, PC, android, Windows, and Linux.

The mixer is likewise USB and ethernet connectable, can work as a router (you’ll more than likely need a different router for big locations), and even includes its own processor that can assist take a load off of your computer throughout mixdown sessions.

The hardware does not fail, either. The Onyx preamps are squeaklessly tidy, and every channel is equipped. You also get 14 XLR sends out, and the gadget is fully rack-mountable.

Utilized by popular musicians like Kenny Chesney and Car Seat Headrest, this mixer will take your home studio into the realm of expert recording.

The only downside to the Ui16 is the bane of all mixers: noise. The preamps are most likely to hiss just a bit, especially when the phantom power is used in the input.

The other features and performance make this mixer a steal if that’s something you can live with.

Restricted tech compatibility (Apple just for master control).

High price.

Price & Reviews.

  1. Soundcraft Ui16.

    For this design, Soundcraft took the concept of the Behringer XR16 and the Allen and Heath QU-SB, and took the cost point down. The mixer has all the functions (inputs, EQ controls, results, etc.) that you might request for, making it great for those who want the tech-savvy connection however don’t wish to pay through the nose for it.

iOS just control.

rate.

Rate & Reviews.

ANALOG MIXERS.

Pros

Individual display blending

Stable and reliable software application

Expandable to 38 inputs

Tidy sound

Great choice of impacts

Rack-mountable

USB compatible

Internal DSP.

Cons

Compact.

Economical.

A lot of results.

Tech-compatible.

Cons.

Pros

Pros.

Not the most instinctive user interface/workflow on the mixer

Audio routing on the computer can be a bit complex

Cost & Reviews

  1. Zoom LiveTrak L-8

    Zoom offers another podcasting-specific style with the LiveTrak, which, like the Yamaha AG03, was created particularly with this growing home-studio market in mind.
  2. While it doesn’t bear the name acknowledgment or the minimalistic design of the Yamaha, the model is loaded with its own unique set of helpful features for banners and podcasters.

The hardware is high quality (16 clean, low-noise, gain-programmable Midas preamps) and the software is trustworthy and steady.

Ui16’s main talking point is its HTML5 control. This enables you to manage the mixer through any gadget’s internet browser, not just a gadget that can handle an app.

This is fantastic if your house studio is going to be utilized by a wide variety of people, preventing OS problems completely.

Great and detailed control software application.

clean noise.

sturdiness.

wireless control.

Cons.

  1. Mackie ProFX 8 V2.

    The ProFX 8 V2 features a timeless analog design, with separate EQ and level pots for each channel.
  2. The model isn’t simply bare bones– with just the best number (and type) of techy add-ons to provide it a really modern-day performance, it’s a remarkably intuitive option for a house studio.

Although it includes over 100 effects, if there’s anything negative to be said about the Mixpad MP124FX, it’s most likely that it’s a little boring.

There’s no Hi-Z input, and while it is USB compatible, there’s little else tech-wise to make it stand apart. This may be exactly what some people are looking for in a home studio mixer, a no-nonsense mixer that does its task well.

Pros.

Innovative connection.

Podcaster-friendly.

Bluetooth suitable.

Direct recording.

Cons.

Hard to repair.

Some defective designs.

Cost & Reviews.

  1. Alesis Multimix 8 USB FX.

    If you’re just beginning your home studio, and are trying to find an economical mixer to find out the ins and outs of using a mixer, the Alesis Multimix may be your best choice.
  2. The style is similar to other basic analog mixers. This makes it a good design to discover on– there are no complex digital menus to navigate.

Pros.

Simple style.

Durable develop quality.

USB connectivity.

Effects.

Hi-Z inputs.

Affordable.

Cons.

Yamaha’s “loopback” function makes streaming a breeze. When loopback is changed on, the mixer takes a backing track or other audio input from a computer or iPad and integrates it with audio inputs from mics and instruments in real-time, producing a single mix that can be streamed instantly.

Steeper learning curve for an analog mixer (some “digital opacity”) minimal EQ controls.

Rate & Reviews.

Do I need a USB mixer for a home tape-recording studio?

The simple response is no. You can simply utilize the preamps in an audio user interface to get the audio into your computer and then the audio back out of your computer to your studio screens.

In addition to offering connectivity for customer gadgets to the Super Channel, the Bluetooth connectivity allows you to play music through the mixer as an interface.

This means that if you decide to pack up the mixer from your house studio to play at another occasion or a wedding event, you can transmit your music through the PA from a Bluetooth-connected cellular phone or iPod.

Pros.

Pros.

Low-cost hardware.

Some noise on monitors.

Low taping quality.

Cost & Reviews.

  1. Samson Mixpad MXP124FX.

    Samson is understood for simplicity and value, and regardless of their decision to utilize every letter in the alphabet as well as every Arabic numeral in its name, their Mixpad MXP124FX measured up to the business’s track record: it’s an easy analog mixer with basic, no-nonsense functionality and simply sufficient technological edge to make it worth the buy.

The minimalistic and visually stylish black and white design combine an exceptionally standard analog mixer structure with USB and iPad compression, reverb and compatibility effects, and the much-hyped “loopback” function.

Fairly basic controls.

Restricted noise metering.

No Hi-Z inputs.

Rate & Reviews.

  1. Yamaha AG06.

    Yamaha developed the AG06 for podcasters, and they’ll enjoy it. The minimal channels and iPad connection make it easy to use for an audio beginner, however tech-savvy enough for a skilled player. That’s not to say that musicians (particularly among the singer-songwriter cohort) will turn up their noses at this practical and user-friendly mixer.

Samson got imaginative with the channel control designs here. The very first two feature compressor controls, and the first 4, which accept XLR inputs and have phantom power and mic preamps, remain in the basic row/knob setup. Nevertheless, the last 4 channels have their three-band EQ controls organized in a fairly non-standard grid configuration, which saves space and offers the mixer a very compact design.

Conclusion.

With these parameters in mind, we picked the Behringer X32 Producer as our top recommendation for a house studio mixer. Its top quality preamps, available and widely compatible software and connectivity, and comprehensive, innovative functions make it a flexible and powerful tool for your recording needs. However, make sure to consider your own situation, and if podcasting is your thing, offer the Yamaha AG06 a look for a model customized to your requirements.

It’s likewise got the technical specs to handle all the kinds of inputs you can throw at it, consisting of phantom power and hi-z. While you might require to bear with minor background sound, this is a great buy, specifically for a home studio that’s just beginning.

Extremely compact.

Easy to utilize.

Budget friendly.

Distinct functions for podcasting and streaming.

Integrated DSP.

iPad compatibility.

Cons.

For the low cost, the Multimix also includes enough sturdiness and performance to make it worth the cost. The results sound impressively good in live scenarios, the preamps are reputably noise-free, and with its compact and light-weight building (under 2.25 kg) you can get away with lugging it from small gig to back home for a recording session.

Contribute to this reliability and simpleness the tech features, consisting of 16 results from the Ready FX engine, graphic EQ, Hi-Z input, and USB connectivity and recording, and the ProFX becomes a powerful however economical mixer for your house studio.

The StudioLive AR8 USB’s “Super Channel” sticks out as one of its most unique features. Working similarly to Yamaha’s “Loopback,” it takes input from a computer or a Bluetooth-connected gadget and integrates it with other stereo inputs, as much as a total of 4. This means that musicians or podcasters can play or podcast along to a backing track that will be included into a final mix.

Pros.

USB Mixer Buyer’s Guide.

The myriad features available on today’s mixer models can be as complicated as the knobs and flashing lights on a mixer itself for someone who’s learning how to operate one. However if you bear in mind a few key things.

So far audio interfaces aren’t being used for live noise. So if you have an usage for all the features discovered in a mixer then it may be smarter to get a mixer. The live environment is where the routing capabilities really comes into play with a mixer.

Preamp Quality.

One of the most typical problems you’ll discover on evaluations of mixers is that the preamps hiss or hum. Depending on the way they are made, preamps can have low or high levels of background noise, or, if you’re lucky, no sound at all.

Rate.

User-friendliness.

Simpleness.

Good noise.

Cons.

Analog or Digital Mixer?

It might appear like just a matter of choice, but whether your mixer is an analogue or digital design can significantly impact the way you connect with it. Due to the fact that the pots for each channel are laid out in plain sight, Analogue mixers tend to be much easier to discover on and run rapidly.

The hardware on the ProFX 8 V2 is reliable, high quality, and resilient. Mackie’s Vita preamps are some of the cleanest around. While they run underneath the hood, the resilient steel chassis keeps everything on the inside safe and sound-producing, whether you’re at home or on the roadway.

What will a mixer do for me?

A mixer will frequently provide you more inputs than a spending plan audio interface on it’s own. They can likewise be used for live programs or gigs, which can be helpful if you’re a vocalist songwriter or solo musician and wish to use the mixer while you’re on the road.

Buying a digital model can make things a little trickier, as you might need to browse through complicated digital menus to discover the specific setting for the channel you desire. Some mixers even take a hybrid method, attempting to mix the user-friendliness of an analog design with the increased capability of the digital, generally in an app.

Restricted inputs and channels.

Minimal effects.

Cost & Reviews.

  1. PreSonus StudioLive AR8 USB.

    This PreSonus design is hybrid in more ways than one. As an analog-inspired mixer with a great deal of digital ability, it’s easy for the home studio newbie to comprehend, but it has plenty to find behind the knobs. It’s also the ideal balance for somebody who is involved in podcasting and music recording: it has enough channels to handle small ensembles, however it has podcaster-friendly onboard recording, Hi-Z inputs, and even Bluetooth connectivity.

Planned Use.

What you desire to utilize your mixer for is an important element to think about when making your option. Do you want professional sound, or are you fine with discovering the ropes on something a bit more basic? The answers to these questions can help you identify what functions you require, how numerous channels you’re looking for, and the price variety you desire to shoot for.

Both kinds of mixers have their faithful fans, and both have their drawbacks and advantages. Make certain to think about which is best for your situation.

Rate.

Simpleness.

Compact style.

Cons.

 7,121 total views

Please Share

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter

Leave a Reply